Friday, May 6, 2022

Performance Management Cycle

 


The performance management cycle is an annually re-occurring conduct in which employees are evaluated throughout the year (Russell and Russell, 2009) 

According to the AIHR Academy guide lines (2004), All employees go through this cycle, starting with goal-setting at the beginning of the year, followed by the monitoring of their progress, helping them develop to do better, and ending with a formal evaluation afterward. The goal of this cycle is to develop and execute employee performance plans. These plans help in focusing employee efforts on achieving organizational goals which, in turn, helps to align employee priorities with the goals of the organization

According to the Russell and Russell (2009), Performance management involves much more than just assigning ratings and It is a continuous cycle that involves below five stages.


Planning : work in advance so that expectations and goals can be set

Monitoring: progress and performance continually;

Developing : the employee's ability to perform through training and work assignments;

Rating : periodically to summarize performance and,

Rewarding : good performance.


                                         Source: AIHR Academy article


Planning

According to the Russell and Russell (2009), "Planning" means setting performance expectations and goals for groups and individuals to channel their efforts toward achieving organizational objectives. It also includes the measures that will be used to determine whether expectations and goals are being met. Involving employees in the planning process helps them understand the goals of the organization, what needs to be done, why it needs to be done, and how well it should be done.


Monitoring

"Monitoring" means consistently measuring performance and providing ongoing feedback to employees and work groups on their progress toward reaching their goals. (Russell and Russell, 2009)  Ongoing monitoring provides the opportunity to check how employees are doing and to identify and resolve any problems early. (Russell and Russell, 2009) 

Developing

According to the Russell and Russell, (2009), "Developing" means increasing the capacity to perform through training, giving assignments that introduce new skills or higher level of responsibility, improving work processes, or other methods. Development efforts can encourage and strengthen good performance and help employees keep up with changes in the workplace.


Rating

According to the Russell and Russell, (2009), "Rating" means evaluating employee or group performance against the elements and standards in an employee's performance plan, summarizing that performance, and assigning a rating of record.


Rewarding

According to the Russell and Russell, (2009), "Rewarding" means providing incentives to and recognition of employees, individually and as members of groups, for their performance and acknowledging their contributions to the agency's mission. There are many ways to acknowledge good performance, from a sincere "Thank You!" for a specific job well done to granting the highest level appreciation.


References

Armstrong, M. and Baron, A., 2005. Managing Performance. 1st ed. London: CIPD.

Aguinis, H., 2019. Performance Management. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson.

Bhattacharyya, D., 2011. Performance Management Systems and Strategies. 1st ed. India: Pearson.

Hansen, A. (2021). The purposes of performance management systems and processes: a cross-functional typology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)

Russell, J. and Russell, L., 2009. Ultimate Performance Management: Training to Transform Performance Reviews into Performance Partnerships. 1st ed. USA: ASTD Press.


8 comments:

  1. Hi Saliya , Nicely done . Encourage all employees to perform at their best by ensuring uniformity in performance evaluations.
    This strategy should be applied in a fair and transparent manner.
    Many companies and managers today see performance management as a continuous cycle of actions that connects the company's culture, corporate goals, and strategy to individual performance and contributions (John Mattone,2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Maheshini,
      Thanks for the feedback.
      Once effective performance has been defined at the individual, team, and organizational levels, organizational members need to participate in the evaluation and review of their performance (Kinicki et al., 2013)

      Delete
  2. Hi Saliya, agree with the post. Performance Management supports enhancing of operational performances in an organization which ensure the achievement of organizational goals and objectives (Armstrong, 2014). Performance Management is an ongoing cycle of activities such as Planning, Developing, Monitoring, Reviewing and Rewarding that builds a relationship among organizational culture, strategies and corporate goals to ensure individual performances (John ,2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Nilushi,
      Thanks for the feedback and an effective PM system should encourage regular and ongoing feedback through both formal and informal processes (Baker, 2010)

      Delete
  3. Hi Saliya, Agree with your post on performance management cycle and the activities involved in the cycle. Further Armstrong, (2009) states in his handbook of performance management that there are key performance management activities that need to be performed within the cycle. Which are employee performance and development planning, establishing performance criteria, agreeing on performance measures, managing performance periodically , formally review and analyse performance at the end of the agreed period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Shalini,
      Thanks for the feedback.
      We also saw nine articles that examined PM in the context of organizational performance and high performance human resource practices or systems. In many of these papers, the relationship between PM and bundles of different HR practices such as compensation, staffing, and employee participation were examined (Stumpf, Doh, & Tymon, 2010; Zhang & Li, 2009; C. Zheng, Morrison, & O’Neill, 2006).

      Delete
  4. Hi Saliya. Comprehensive post. According to Armstrong (2006), a performance management cycle should have the continuous support of the top management and it should emphasize that the aim is to develop a high-performance culture and integrate organizational and individual goals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Ashanthi,
      Thanks for the feedback & In addition to this, Work engagement (WE) is an effective antecedent of employee performance (Abraham, 2012; Macey & Schneider, 2008a).

      Delete

Relationship between variables in the context of employee’s performance

  Area’s Focused, Effect of capacity building on the employees’ performance, Effect of managers’ support on the employees’ performance, Mode...